This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: gcc: stable 4.5 soon?
- From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:51:39 -0500
- Subject: Re: gcc: stable 4.5 soon?
- References: <1286475634.5420.59.camel@YAAKOV04>
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:20 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I have been using a gcc-4.5.1 built with your 4.5.0 patchset for some
> time. Besides the issues I noted back in August[1], I have been pleased
> with its performance. Any chance we can get a stable 4.5.1 soon with at
> least the easier issues noted therein fixed?
>
> [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00412.html
I finally managed to fix the GCJ tools; what I didn't realize is that
libgcj uses its own NIO code instead of GNU Classpath's. Patch
attached; this *replaces* classpath-0.98-FIONREAD.patch.
Could we get a timeframe on a stable 4.5.1 including this patch?
Yaakov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35536
--- origsrc/gcc-4.5.1/libjava/gnu/java/nio/channels/natFileChannelPosix.cc 2007-04-02 20:05:50.000000000 -0500
+++ src/gcc-4.5.1/libjava/gnu/java/nio/channels/natFileChannelPosix.cc 2010-10-27 13:39:34.044718100 -0500
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ FileChannelImpl::available (void)
#if defined (FIONREAD)
r = ::ioctl (fd, FIONREAD, &num);
- if (r == -1 && errno == ENOTTY)
+ if (r == -1 && (errno == ENOTTY || errno == EINVAL))
{
// If the ioctl doesn't work, we don't care.
r = 0;
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple