Re: modification time disorder: touch-related?

[Lapo Luchini <lapo at lapo dot it>]

Lapo Luchini wrote:
> % LANG=C ll -rt --full-time whois-5.0.8-1/build|tail
> -rwxrwxr-x+ 1 lapo None 83077 2010-11-09 21:59:36.985126500 +0100 whois.exe
> drwxr-xr-x+ 1 lapo None 12288 2010-11-09 21:59:37.387149500 +0100 .
> -rwxrwxr-x+ 1 lapo None 42896 2010-11-09 21:59:37.445152800 +0100
> mkpasswd.exe
> -rw-rw-r--+ 1 lapo None 72777 2010-11-09 21:59:37.691232900 +0100 whois.o
> -rw-rw-r--+ 1 lapo None  4817 2010-11-09 21:59:37.892232900 +0100 utils.o
> -rw-rw-r--+ 1 lapo None 16665 2010-11-09 21:59:38.408232900 +0100 mkpasswd.o

I can reproduce this at will using ccache.
Everything's normal without ccache:

-rw-r--r--+ 1 lapo None 72777 2010-11-13 09:04:41.193483200 +0100 whois.o
-rw-r--r--+ 1 lapo None  4817 2010-11-13 09:04:41.372493500 +0100 utils.o
-rwxr-xr-x+ 1 lapo None 83077 2010-11-13 09:04:41.678511000 +0100 whois.exe
-rw-r--r--+ 1 lapo None 16665 2010-11-13 09:04:41.988528700 +0100 mkpasswd.o
drwxr-xr-x+ 1 lapo None 12288 2010-11-13 09:04:42.203541000 +0100 .
-rwxr-xr-x+ 1 lapo None 42896 2010-11-13 09:04:42.260544300 +0100
mkpasswd.exe

I wonder how I didn't encounter this ccache bug (?) in the last few
years, or maybe it's also Windows-7 related?
(no, FAT32 is not the issue, my CCACHE_DIR is in the same NTFS
filesystem I'm compiling those package in)

I wonder if latest ccache would still do that.
Maybe I'll try to upgrade it locally and check.

-- 
Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/

âWe could tell you what it's about. But then, of course, we'd have to
kill you.â (tagline of movie "Sneakers", 1992)


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple