This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I never did see a clear description of OP's goals. "Performance" was among them, so it was unclear why typical mathlinline.h content would have been rejected e.g.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Myers"
The OP is trying to build Perl itself, not use it; hence the need for long double support functions...
You don't need "long double support functions" to build perl ... unless you want to build a perl whose NV is a long double (instead of a double).
Presumably the op wants to build a perl whose NV is a long double so that he can make use of that extra precision. Given that he can't build such a perl, the next best way of accessing that extra precision he wants is, imo, to use Math::MPFR.
-- Tim Prince
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |