This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Use of acl on smb related filesystems
Greetings, Andrew DeFaria!
> On 1/24/2012 1:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> It's probably because your FS doesn't support ACLs. Your mount
>> output
>>
>> //fs-irva-82/adefaria on /home/adefaria type netapp (binary,user)
>>
>> shows that the path points to a NetApp drive. NetApp drives have
>> various modes. They can behave like FAT, NTFS, or a POSIX filesystem.
>> From your other report I assume it's set up not to support ACLs.
>> What does
>>
>> $ /usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
>>
>> print?
> Ltsdo-adefaria:/usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
> Device Type : 7
> Characteristics : 10
> Volume Name : <CIFS.HOMEDIR>
> Serial Number : 0
> Max Filenamelength : 255
> Filesystemname : <FAT>
> Flags : 40007
> FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH : TRUE
> FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES : TRUE
> FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK : TRUE
> FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS : FALSE
> FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION : FALSE
> FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS : FALSE
> FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES : FALSE
> FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
> FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
> FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED : FALSE
> FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS : FALSE
> FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION : FALSE
> FILE_NAMED_STREAMS : TRUE
> FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME : FALSE
> FILE_SEQUENTIAL_WRITE_ONCE : FALSE
> FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS : FALSE
> My guess is that FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS: FALSE is not a good sign.
Starting from "Filesystemname : <FAT>" the rest was quite predictable.
> Is this related to this thread:
> http://old.nabble.com/NetAPP---cygwin-1.7.7-1-avoid-Recycle-BIN-dot-files-td30236482.html?
> In the next reply you advocate me getting a more recent "snapshot". Did
> you mean a more recent "release"
When one of the head developers says "snapshot", she do mean "snapshot".
> or do you want me to move to "snapshots" (which I assume are sorta like
> betas.
They "sorta like" any quality they are happened to be.
But right now, they are in a state of release candidates for 1.7.10.
> Skimming some of the history (sorry I have a meeting fast approaching) this seems like a
> fairly recent development. Has there been a resolution? (Gotta go, will
> check back later).
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@freemail.ru) 25.01.2012, <05:03>
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple