This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Please test latest snapshots 2013-11-20
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:25:25 -0500
- Subject: Re: Please test latest snapshots 2013-11-20
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20131123113650 dot GL28310 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <7B7D8AEB-7468-4611-8497-0E5190A2549A at Denis-Excoffier dot org>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:11:23PM +0100, Denis Excoffier wrote:
>On 2013-11-23 12:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>we're planning to release Cygwin 1.7.26 next week. It would be quite
>>helpful if those of you comfortable to install snapshots would perform
>>some last-minute testing.
>
>I have no new (see below) problem to report with this latest snapshot
>(20131123) itself,
There is no 20131123 snapshot.
>but itâs a pity that we cannot compile it under (itself and) the
>latest cygwin packages (see
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-10/msg00382.html, seems related to the
>new /usr/include/spawn.h).
>
>On the other hand, using: - w32api-headers 3.0b_svn5935-1 instead of
>3.0.0-1 - w32api-runtime 3.0b_svn5935-1 instead of 3.0.0-1 -
>mingw64-i686-headers 3.0b_svn5935-1 instead of 3.0.0-1 -
>mingw64-i686-runtime 3.0b_svn5935-2 instead of 3.0.0-1 (iâm under
>i686)
>
>all is fine (in particular using the new gcc-4.8.2).
As the above quoted issue states, if you are having problems building
then please provide patches.
However, given that the problem regards a header file that that Corinna
specifically mentioned as going away, it seems like that particular
problem can no longer occur.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple