This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygcheck and literal plus sign
- From: Steven Penny <svnpenn at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:25:58 -0600
- Subject: Re: cygcheck and literal plus sign
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAAXzdLUjc=cYva6EfZQjRArt5NQbPG3VTTGEch=kN1GEx2-fjA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140122055830 dot GB4286 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <g4bvd9549dive5dnnh81c5frnqdlbtkku2 at 4ax dot com> <20140122150721 dot GA6650 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <CACUHbYPafq60OB825c2Wk5TLd+Zbt4MnM0Kzd9Rm1pv3xTTSgQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:05 AM, David Boyce wrote
> How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?
Please, no more lazy answers
$ cygcheck -p 'g[+][+].exe'
Found 0 matches for g[ ][ ].exe
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple