This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: setup.exe different packages
- From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko at nexgo dot de>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:30:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: setup.exe different packages
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAO2ddnb5tMR_qVov8eDqmXeStvdgsV17eyL2mzwJvYJY41s2wQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <52E7C7C6 dot 3000606 at gmail dot com> <CAO2ddnY2UjXnqGJ0ve3bLkH4pctYK-2YdrO1jVpJEjnbYQHwCg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAO2ddnby4SiW+AXyqLx6QdeRtGm7g-=zM71pWJyY5b1Fp=UpJA at mail dot gmail dot com>
BGINFO4X writes:
> I did it, and the results are diferent.
Because you made it so.
> I attach on the email both setup results: with commandline and with GUI.
So you managed to trick setup into not installing some Base packages in
the GUI. If you wouldn't have done that, you'd have installed the exact
same packages in both cases (I've checked).
> What I'm doing is trying to install ONLY bash, not the Base category,
> so I think that you are wrong.
You always have to have Base installed (which already includes bash).
If you really want to create your own installer you'd first need to
understand what setup.exe is doing and why.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple