This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries
- From: Jean-Pierre Flori <jpflori at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:28:19 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140402090750 dot GP2508 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <lhsctu$56e$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <20140407084312 dot GA2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <lhtqa1$ie3$1 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhtsb6$ie3$2 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhtve5$ie3$4 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhtvgh$ie3$5 at ger dot gmane dot org> <lhu212$ie3$6 at ger dot gmane dot org> <20140407113027 dot GA30595 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <lhu3dq$ie3$7 at ger dot gmane dot org> <20140407115730 dot GA721 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
Le Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:57:30 +0200, Corinna Vinschen a ÃcritÂ:
> On Apr 7 11:50, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>> Le Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:30:27 +0200, Corinna Vinschen a ÃcritÂ:
>> >
>> > I'm sorry, but I don't know how this works exactly. The nm prefix is
>> > only added for external references, not for inlined functions, but I
>> > don't know the gory details. You may be better off to ask on the gcc
>> > mailing list.
>> >
>> No problem, I've already learned tons of stuff thanks to your help.
>> I've just posted on gcc-help.
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-04/msg00024.html
>
> Thanks. A simple testcase would still be nice, of course.
>
>
Sure, but it seems the issue is that I cannot get the __nm_ prefix when I
elaborate on a minimal problem like you did.
I'll still try to get something this afternoon.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple