This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: setfacl(2.4.0.15): for next year !!!!!
- From: Houder <houder at xs4all dot nl>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 15:42:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: setfacl(2.4.0.15): for next year !!!!!
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <6ea00be43c852b42e0e59adcb23d0004 at xs4all dot nl> <20151221172503 dot GK4034 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <5eb15a91b67658daba604310dcaa20ee at xs4all dot nl>
On 2015-12-22 12:37, Houder wrote:
On 2015-12-21 18:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 21 17:30, Houder wrote:
Hi Corinna,
For next year !!!!! (posted as a reminder) ... See below.
Next year? Nope... see below.
Hi Corinna,
Thank you for all the hard work you do ...
As an encore (for this year though ;-). See below (Cygwin-2.4.0-0.16).
<==== 16
[snip]
64-%% setfacl -m m:rwx bar.txt
64-%% getfacl bar.txt
# file: bar.txt
# owner: Henri
# group: None
user::rw-
group::r--
mask:rwx <==== yes, as requested by me, but ...
other:r--
64-%% ls -l bar.txt
-rw-rwxr-- 1 Henri None 0 Dec 22 12:21 bar.txt
- does this output make sense?
(no access to Linux at the moment; cannot verify)
Just got myself access to Linux (FC19) ... old, yes.
FC19 has the same "weird" (to me) behaviour as Cygwin now has. The
difference is that 'ls -l' on FC19 shows an additional plus sign.
As follows:
-rw-rwxr--+ 1 Henri ... bar.txt
So, the definition of the mask entry is slightly different than I
argued in my post before this one -- ... continued (2) --.
Regards,
Henri
======
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple