system lags and dysfunctional after cygwin update
Warren Young
wyml@etr-usa.com
Fri May 13 16:56:00 GMT 2016
On May 13, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> On 2016-05-13 10:38, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> But after taking a peek at the AST license, it’s pretty clear it’s incompatible
>> with the GPL.
>
> True, but it is Open Source and therefore would be acceptable.
It depends on what “it” is.
The old AT&T AST license was most definitely not acceptable, requiring written acceptance of the license in order to transfer the source code. You may remember the clickthrough license on the old AT&T AST site. That’s fine for AT&T, but it doesn’t let Cygwin distribute source packages, for example.
There are other onerous terms in the AST license, too, such as a requirement that you tell AT&T in writing any time you made a patch to their software. Thus if it doesn’t build OOTB on Cygwin, we couldn’t distribute it in binary-only form, either.
All of that apparently went away at some point, though, because the header comment in a few of the ksh source files I looked at say it’s under the Eclipse Public License now:
https://github.com/att/ast
The old AST wasn’t even compatible with GitHub — no explicit license acceptance on git clone — but I think we can trust that as an official distribution of the ksh source code, since AT&T themselves link to the GitHub repo from here:
http://www.research.att.com/software_tools
So never mind, I think we’re in the clear here. But IANAL.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list