This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I'm running on Windows 7 64bit, the disk has NTFS, and I have Windows enabled to track the correct file access time. With Cygwin, I see the following oddity: -0-1- ~/gitwrk/vp5 > ls -lu c:/tmp/x* -rw-r--r-- 1 FISRONA Domain Users 10 Apr 11 06:59 c:/tmp/xx (waiting a couple of minutes) -0-1- ~/gitwrk/vp5 > ls -lut c:/tmp/x* -rw-r--r-- 1 FISRONA Domain Users 10 Apr 11 07:01 c:/tmp/xx I didn't touch the file in between, but the reported access time changed. Further experimentation shows, that the reported access time changes as soon as I use the -t option with ls. As long as I just do ls -lu, the access time does not change. Next, I double-checked in a Windows CMD shell: C:\tmp>dir /TA xx Datenträger in Laufwerk C: ist SYSTEM Volumeseriennummer: B44F-4301 Verzeichnis von C:\tmp 11.04.2017 06:56 10 xx 1 Datei(en), 10 Bytes 0 Verzeichnis(se), 272.844.148.736 Bytes frei We can see that the access time reported by Windows is *different* from the one reported by Cygwin. We hence have, what I believe, two bugs: The access time reported by the -u option of Cygwin is, at least sometimes, incorrect, and using -t on ls causes Cygwin to subsequently report a different access time. Ronald
Attachment:
cygcheck.out
Description: Binary data
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |