This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.10.0-0.1
On 1/18/2018 6:28 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/18/2018 4:30 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2018-01-18 08:35, Ken Brown wrote:
On 1/17/2018 5:29 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
Do we need a new gcc release to go along with the recent ssp changes?
The following commit message seems to answer my question:
Note that this does require building gcc with --disable-libssp and
Are there plans to coordinate the release of Cygwin 2.10.0 with a new
gcc release? In the meantime, I guess package maintainers have to build
with -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE in order to test building with Cygwin 2.10.0. Or
am I missing something?
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE is not the default, so simply omitting it is
I was talking about building projects in which _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
defined by default. That happens, for instance, in the gnulib
subdirectory of the emacs tree, so it may affect other projects that use
You could also just delete
/usr/lib/gcc/*-pc-cygwin/6.4.0/include/ssp, since we won't need it
anymore and it wasn't even being used properly in the first place.
That's a simpler workaround than what I was doing. Thanks.
Here's another issue that's come up with _FORTIFY_SOURCE. One of the
emacs source files, fileio.c, makes use of a pointer to readlinkat.
[More precisely, the file uses an external function foo() with a
parameter 'bar' that's a pointer to a function; foo is called in
fileio.c with bar = readlinkat.]
When _FORTIFY_SOURCE > 0, this leads to an "undefined reference to
`__ssp_protected_readlinkat'" linking error. Does this sound like
something that will be fixed with the new gcc release?
I realize I haven't given you full details, but it might be a few days
until I have a chance to extract an STC for this issue, so I thought I'd
give it a shot.
If you can't answer the question based on the information above, I'll
make an STC as soon as I can.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple